Our Impact

Education interventions in the developing world and Zandig Foundation role

Education interventions have been a focus globally to improve outcomes of people living in developing communities. Since these interventions occur at younger ages, it is conceivable that they can have sustained long-term effects for the children who receive them. In general, the interventions can be split into two categories: (1) Demand side and (2) Supply side. Demand side interventions affect the ability of the individual to get an education, i.e., improving accessibility to schools.

Supply side interventions deal with the quality of the schools, e.g., providing books, computers, tutoring, etc. Although intuitively supply-side interventions are attractive since they seek to improve the quality of the education children receive, the majority of development education research shows that demand side interventions have a larger and more significant effect on the children's future outcomes. Supply side interventions have a large cost and have no guarantee to work. For example, you can buy 15 computers for a school, but if students don't know how to use them, that is a small benefit given a huge cost. Worse yet if the students don't show up to the school, it will all be for nothing.
Demand side interventions increase accessibility to schools through methods such as attendance incentives, scholarships, and health interventions. In fact, one of the most effective interventions is deworming students^. For a small 10 cent deworming tablet, a child's attendance for a year will increase an average of 25%, leading to higher rates of future education.
Moreover, Demand-side interventions are also easier to execute and impose fewer “outside interventions” in the community it affects. They are easier to implement because supply side interventions require more logistics and cost. For example, if you wanted to buy books, you would have to decide which books to buy, where to buy them and if it matches their curriculum. Supply side interventions can be too imposing,i.e., it might assume people in the community don't know how to best educate their children.
Vidya Shakti is following demand side intervention model by employing a scholarship based intervention, specifically to secondary and higher education. Scholarship based interventions in Ghana have shown increases in “young people's educational attainment, knowledge, skills, and preventative health behaviors” ^^. Similar results were shown in a national study of Colombia. Specifically, for women who received these scholarships, they were less likely to end up in teenage marriages or pregnancies and more likely to have a job post-education. Following this model, Vidya Shakti hopes to provide the same.
^ Deworm the World: https://www.evidenceaction.org/dewormtheworld/
^^ Returns to Secondary Schooling in Ghana: https://www.poverty-action.org/study/returns-secondary-schooling-ghana

By Nitin Krishnan -Development Economist